Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application
This paper develops and compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-phase-locked loop (non-PLL) grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain insight and understanding into how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. The first scheme adopts power tracking based on an outer current loop in grid-connected mode and droop control in islanded mode, and the second uses droop control in both grid-connected and islanded modes. Analytical study is developed to compare the performance of these two strategies from various aspects, including fundamental differences, transition operation, power tracking, and P-Q capability with low point-of-common-coupling (PCC) voltages. Extensive simulation testing is carried out to validate the control performance of these two control strategies, and the simulation testing confirms the findings of the analytic study. Finally, the second strategy is recommended because of its superior control performance and ease of implementation. The analysis and results are useful in developing reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because increasing numbers of inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in future grids because of their improved stability and reliability.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - This paper develops and compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-phase-locked loop (non-PLL) grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain insight and understanding into how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. The first scheme adopts power tracking based on an outer current loop in grid-connected mode and droop control in islanded mode, and the second uses droop control in both grid-connected and islanded modes. Analytical study is developed to compare the performance of these two strategies from various aspects, including fundamental differences, transition operation, power tracking, and P-Q capability with low point-of-common-coupling (PCC) voltages. Extensive simulation testing is carried out to validate the control performance of these two control strategies, and the simulation testing confirms the findings of the analytic study. Finally, the second strategy is recommended because of its superior control performance and ease of implementation. The analysis and results are useful in developing reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because increasing numbers of inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in future grids because of their improved stability and reliability.
AU - Wang, Jing
DB - C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange
DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies
DO - 10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064
KW - Solar
KW - Photovoltaics
KW - PV
KW - Battery energy storage
KW - Power electronics and inverters
KW - Power electronics
KW - Inverters
KW - Diesel generators
KW - Other liquid-fuel generators
KW - Power plant controls
KW - SCADA
KW - Standards
KW - Interconnection
KW - Protection
KW - Case studies
KW - Performance
LA - English
DA - 2021/01/01
PY - 2021
PB - NLR
T1 - Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application
UR - https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064
ER -
Wang, Jing . Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application. NLR, 1 January, 2021, C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064.
Wang, J. (2021). Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application. [Data set]. C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. NLR. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064
Wang, Jing . Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application. NLR, January, 1, 2021. Distributed by C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064
@misc{CMIX_Dataset_62,
title = {Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application},
author = {Wang, Jing },
abstractNote = {This paper develops and compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-phase-locked loop (non-PLL) grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain insight and understanding into how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. The first scheme adopts power tracking based on an outer current loop in grid-connected mode and droop control in islanded mode, and the second uses droop control in both grid-connected and islanded modes. Analytical study is developed to compare the performance of these two strategies from various aspects, including fundamental differences, transition operation, power tracking, and P-Q capability with low point-of-common-coupling (PCC) voltages. Extensive simulation testing is carried out to validate the control performance of these two control strategies, and the simulation testing confirms the findings of the analytic study. Finally, the second strategy is recommended because of its superior control performance and ease of implementation. The analysis and results are useful in developing reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because increasing numbers of inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in future grids because of their improved stability and reliability.},
url = {https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/62},
year = {2021},
howpublished = {C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange, NLR, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064},
note = {Accessed: 2026-10-13},
doi = {10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064}
}
https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064
Details
Data from Jan 1, 2021
Last updated Mar 30, 2026
Submitted Jun 2, 2026
Organization
NLR
Contact
Jing Wang

