Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application

Publicly accessible License 

This paper develops and compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-phase-locked loop (non-PLL) grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain insight and understanding into how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. The first scheme adopts power tracking based on an outer current loop in grid-connected mode and droop control in islanded mode, and the second uses droop control in both grid-connected and islanded modes. Analytical study is developed to compare the performance of these two strategies from various aspects, including fundamental differences, transition operation, power tracking, and P-Q capability with low point-of-common-coupling (PCC) voltages. Extensive simulation testing is carried out to validate the control performance of these two control strategies, and the simulation testing confirms the findings of the analytic study. Finally, the second strategy is recommended because of its superior control performance and ease of implementation. The analysis and results are useful in developing reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because increasing numbers of inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in future grids because of their improved stability and reliability.

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - This paper develops and compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-phase-locked loop (non-PLL) grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain insight and understanding into how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. The first scheme adopts power tracking based on an outer current loop in grid-connected mode and droop control in islanded mode, and the second uses droop control in both grid-connected and islanded modes. Analytical study is developed to compare the performance of these two strategies from various aspects, including fundamental differences, transition operation, power tracking, and P-Q capability with low point-of-common-coupling (PCC) voltages. Extensive simulation testing is carried out to validate the control performance of these two control strategies, and the simulation testing confirms the findings of the analytic study. Finally, the second strategy is recommended because of its superior control performance and ease of implementation. The analysis and results are useful in developing reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because increasing numbers of inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in future grids because of their improved stability and reliability. AU - Wang, Jing DB - C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies DO - 10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064 KW - Solar KW - Photovoltaics KW - PV KW - Battery energy storage KW - Power electronics and inverters KW - Power electronics KW - Inverters KW - Diesel generators KW - Other liquid-fuel generators KW - Power plant controls KW - SCADA KW - Standards KW - Interconnection KW - Protection KW - Case studies KW - Performance LA - English DA - 2021/01/01 PY - 2021 PB - NLR T1 - Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application UR - https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Wang, Jing . Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application. NLR, 1 January, 2021, C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064.
Wang, J. (2021). Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application. [Data set]. C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. NLR. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064
Wang, Jing . Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application. NLR, January, 1, 2021. Distributed by C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064
@misc{CMIX_Dataset_62, title = {Design Power Control Strategies of Grid-Forming Inverters for Microgrid Application}, author = {Wang, Jing }, abstractNote = {This paper develops and compares two control schemes in the application control layer of a non-phase-locked loop (non-PLL) grid-forming (GFM) inverter to gain insight and understanding into how the two schemes affect the dynamic responses of GFM inverters and the transition operation of microgrids. The first scheme adopts power tracking based on an outer current loop in grid-connected mode and droop control in islanded mode, and the second uses droop control in both grid-connected and islanded modes. Analytical study is developed to compare the performance of these two strategies from various aspects, including fundamental differences, transition operation, power tracking, and P-Q capability with low point-of-common-coupling (PCC) voltages. Extensive simulation testing is carried out to validate the control performance of these two control strategies, and the simulation testing confirms the findings of the analytic study. Finally, the second strategy is recommended because of its superior control performance and ease of implementation. The analysis and results are useful in developing reliable control schemes for non-PLL GFM inverters because increasing numbers of inverters will work as non-PLL grid-forming sources in future grids because of their improved stability and reliability.}, url = {https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/62}, year = {2021}, howpublished = {C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange, NLR, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064}, note = {Accessed: 2026-10-13}, doi = {10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064} }
https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECCE47101.2021.9595064

Details

Data from Jan 1, 2021

Last updated Mar 30, 2026

Submitted Jun 2, 2026

Organization

NLR

Contact

Jing Wang

Authors

Jing Wang

NLR
Submission Downloads