Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives

Publicly accessible License 

The report, Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives, documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments. This report documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments to determine the impact of photovoltaic (PV) inverter grid support functions on various anti-islanding detection methods. The project team included Sandia National Laboratories and Northern Plains Power Technologies. Topics covered include: (1) Testbed setup for conducting the laboratory experiments (inverters tested were single-phase 3 kilowatt, and three-phase 50 kilowatt). (2) The grid support functions studied were volt-var (with watt priority), frequency-watt, and ride-through. (3). The anti-islanding methods studied were non-continuous positive feedback on frequency error with and without increasing magnitude (two of the most commonly-used methods in modern inverters) and impedance-detection methods (methods that manipulate the negative sequence current). (4) Observations of run-on-time and non-detection zone were made at various active and reactive power conditions, at various irradiance levels, and with various grid support functions. (5). The use of collaborative controls as a mitigation measure was explored in simulations.

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - The report, Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives, documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments. This report documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments to determine the impact of photovoltaic (PV) inverter grid support functions on various anti-islanding detection methods. The project team included Sandia National Laboratories and Northern Plains Power Technologies. Topics covered include: (1) Testbed setup for conducting the laboratory experiments (inverters tested were single-phase 3 kilowatt, and three-phase 50 kilowatt). (2) The grid support functions studied were volt-var (with watt priority), frequency-watt, and ride-through. (3). The anti-islanding methods studied were non-continuous positive feedback on frequency error with and without increasing magnitude (two of the most commonly-used methods in modern inverters) and impedance-detection methods (methods that manipulate the negative sequence current). (4) Observations of run-on-time and non-detection zone were made at various active and reactive power conditions, at various irradiance levels, and with various grid support functions. (5). The use of collaborative controls as a mitigation measure was explored in simulations. AU - Ropp, Michael A2 - Perlenfein, Scott A3 - Schutz, Dustin A4 - Mouw, Chris A5 - Neely, Jason C A6 - Rashkin, Lee J A7 - Gonzalez, Sigifredo DB - C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies DO - KW - Solar KW - Photovoltaics KW - PV KW - Power electronics and inverters KW - Power electronics KW - Inverters KW - Battery energy storage KW - Diesel generators KW - Other liquid-fuel generators KW - Case studies KW - Performance KW - Standards KW - Interconnection KW - Protection KW - Power plant controls KW - SCADA LA - English DA - 2019/01/01 PY - 2019 PB - Sandia National Laboratories T1 - Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives UR - https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Ropp, Michael, et al. Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives. Sandia National Laboratories, 1 January, 2019, C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338.
Ropp, M., Perlenfein, S., Schutz, D., Mouw, C., Neely, J., Rashkin, L., & Gonzalez, S. (2019). Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives. [Data set]. C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. Sandia National Laboratories. https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338
Ropp, Michael, Scott Perlenfein, Dustin Schutz, Chris Mouw, Jason C Neely, Lee J Rashkin, and Sigifredo Gonzalez. Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives. Sandia National Laboratories, January, 1, 2019. Distributed by C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338
@misc{CMIX_Dataset_338, title = {Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives}, author = { Ropp, Michael and Perlenfein, Scott and Schutz, Dustin and Mouw, Chris and Neely, Jason C and Rashkin, Lee J and Gonzalez, Sigifredo}, abstractNote = {The report, Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives, documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments. This report documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments to determine the impact of photovoltaic (PV) inverter grid support functions on various anti-islanding detection methods. The project team included Sandia National Laboratories and Northern Plains Power Technologies. Topics covered include: (1) Testbed setup for conducting the laboratory experiments (inverters tested were single-phase 3 kilowatt, and three-phase 50 kilowatt). (2) The grid support functions studied were volt-var (with watt priority), frequency-watt, and ride-through. (3). The anti-islanding methods studied were non-continuous positive feedback on frequency error with and without increasing magnitude (two of the most commonly-used methods in modern inverters) and impedance-detection methods (methods that manipulate the negative sequence current). (4) Observations of run-on-time and non-detection zone were made at various active and reactive power conditions, at various irradiance levels, and with various grid support functions. (5). The use of collaborative controls as a mitigation measure was explored in simulations.}, url = {https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338}, year = {2019}, howpublished = {C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange, Sandia National Laboratories, https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338}, note = {Accessed: 2026-08-06} }

Details

Data from Jan 1, 2019

Last updated Mar 30, 2026

Submitted Jun 2, 2026

Organization

Sandia National Laboratories

Contact

Michael Ropp

Authors

Michael Ropp

Sandia National Laboratories

Scott Perlenfein

Sandia National Laboratories

Dustin Schutz

Sandia National Laboratories

Chris Mouw

Sandia National Laboratories

Jason C Neely

Sandia National Laboratories

Lee J Rashkin

Sandia National Laboratories

Sigifredo Gonzalez

Sandia National Laboratories
Submission Downloads