Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives
The report, Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives, documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments. This report documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments to determine the impact of photovoltaic (PV) inverter grid support functions on various anti-islanding detection methods. The project team included Sandia National Laboratories and Northern Plains Power Technologies. Topics covered include: (1) Testbed setup for conducting the laboratory experiments (inverters tested were single-phase 3 kilowatt, and three-phase 50 kilowatt). (2) The grid support functions studied were volt-var (with watt priority), frequency-watt, and ride-through. (3). The anti-islanding methods studied were non-continuous positive feedback on frequency error with and without increasing magnitude (two of the most commonly-used methods in modern inverters) and impedance-detection methods (methods that manipulate the negative sequence current). (4) Observations of run-on-time and non-detection zone were made at various active and reactive power conditions, at various irradiance levels, and with various grid support functions. (5). The use of collaborative controls as a mitigation measure was explored in simulations.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - The report, Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives, documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments. This report documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments to determine the impact of photovoltaic (PV) inverter grid support functions on various anti-islanding detection methods. The project team included Sandia National Laboratories and Northern Plains Power Technologies. Topics covered include: (1) Testbed setup for conducting the laboratory experiments (inverters tested were single-phase 3 kilowatt, and three-phase 50 kilowatt). (2) The grid support functions studied were volt-var (with watt priority), frequency-watt, and ride-through. (3). The anti-islanding methods studied were non-continuous positive feedback on frequency error with and without increasing magnitude (two of the most commonly-used methods in modern inverters) and impedance-detection methods (methods that manipulate the negative sequence current). (4) Observations of run-on-time and non-detection zone were made at various active and reactive power conditions, at various irradiance levels, and with various grid support functions. (5). The use of collaborative controls as a mitigation measure was explored in simulations.
AU - Ropp, Michael
A2 - Perlenfein, Scott
A3 - Schutz, Dustin
A4 - Mouw, Chris
A5 - Neely, Jason C
A6 - Rashkin, Lee J
A7 - Gonzalez, Sigifredo
DB - C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange
DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies
DO -
KW - Solar
KW - Photovoltaics
KW - PV
KW - Power electronics and inverters
KW - Power electronics
KW - Inverters
KW - Battery energy storage
KW - Diesel generators
KW - Other liquid-fuel generators
KW - Case studies
KW - Performance
KW - Standards
KW - Interconnection
KW - Protection
KW - Power plant controls
KW - SCADA
LA - English
DA - 2019/01/01
PY - 2019
PB - Sandia National Laboratories
T1 - Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives
UR - https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338
ER -
Ropp, Michael, et al. Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives. Sandia National Laboratories, 1 January, 2019, C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338.
Ropp, M., Perlenfein, S., Schutz, D., Mouw, C., Neely, J., Rashkin, L., & Gonzalez, S. (2019). Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives. [Data set]. C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. Sandia National Laboratories. https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338
Ropp, Michael, Scott Perlenfein, Dustin Schutz, Chris Mouw, Jason C Neely, Lee J Rashkin, and Sigifredo Gonzalez. Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives. Sandia National Laboratories, January, 1, 2019. Distributed by C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338
@misc{CMIX_Dataset_338,
title = {Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives},
author = { Ropp, Michael and Perlenfein, Scott and Schutz, Dustin and Mouw, Chris and Neely, Jason C and Rashkin, Lee J and Gonzalez, Sigifredo},
abstractNote = {The report, Evaluation of Multi-Inverter Anti-Islanding With Grid Support and Ride-Through and Investigation of Island Detection Alternatives, documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments. This report documents results from a set of laboratory simulations and experiments to determine the impact of photovoltaic (PV) inverter grid support functions on various anti-islanding detection methods. The project team included Sandia National Laboratories and Northern Plains Power Technologies. Topics covered include: (1) Testbed setup for conducting the laboratory experiments (inverters tested were single-phase 3 kilowatt, and three-phase 50 kilowatt). (2) The grid support functions studied were volt-var (with watt priority), frequency-watt, and ride-through. (3). The anti-islanding methods studied were non-continuous positive feedback on frequency error with and without increasing magnitude (two of the most commonly-used methods in modern inverters) and impedance-detection methods (methods that manipulate the negative sequence current). (4) Observations of run-on-time and non-detection zone were made at various active and reactive power conditions, at various irradiance levels, and with various grid support functions. (5). The use of collaborative controls as a mitigation measure was explored in simulations.},
url = {https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338},
year = {2019},
howpublished = {C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange, Sandia National Laboratories, https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/338},
note = {Accessed: 2026-08-06}
}
Details
Data from Jan 1, 2019
Last updated Mar 30, 2026
Submitted Jun 2, 2026
Organization
Sandia National Laboratories
Contact
Michael Ropp

