Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids
In this paper, we propose to quantify the trade-off between voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in autonomous AC microgrids with distributed secondary control. It is known that voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in droop-controlled autonomous AC microgrids are two conflicting control objectives that present a natural trade-off between voltage regulation towards the voltage magnitude reference and reactive power sharing accuracy. This trade-off is commonly shown qualitatively without sufficient quantification. In this work, to quantify the trade-off between the two objectives, we focus on distributed secondary control and utilize regression and polynomial surface fitting to identify the requisite parameter area to satisfy the predefined error bands for voltage magnitude regulation and reactive power sharing. Extensive case studies are presented to validate the proposed method.
Citation Formats
TY - DATA
AB - In this paper, we propose to quantify the trade-off between voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in autonomous AC microgrids with distributed secondary control. It is known that voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in droop-controlled autonomous AC microgrids are two conflicting control objectives that present a natural trade-off between voltage regulation towards the voltage magnitude reference and reactive power sharing accuracy. This trade-off is commonly shown qualitatively without sufficient quantification. In this work, to quantify the trade-off between the two objectives, we focus on distributed secondary control and utilize regression and polynomial surface fitting to identify the requisite parameter area to satisfy the predefined error bands for voltage magnitude regulation and reactive power sharing. Extensive case studies are presented to validate the proposed method.
AU - Liu, Zhong
A2 - Lu, Xiaonan
A3 - Leon-Salas, Walter
A4 - Tan, Jin
DB - C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange
DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies
DO - 10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753
KW - Power electronics and inverters
KW - Power electronics
KW - Inverters
KW - Battery energy storage
KW - Solar
KW - Photovoltaics
KW - PV
KW - Diesel generators
KW - Other liquid-fuel generators
KW - Power plant controls
KW - SCADA
KW - Policy and regulation
KW - Policy
KW - Regulation
KW - Case studies
KW - Performance
KW - Local energy resources (LER)
LA - English
DA - 2025/01/01
PY - 2025
PB - Purdue University
T1 - Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids
UR - https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753
ER -
Liu, Zhong, et al. Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids. Purdue University, 1 January, 2025, C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753.
Liu, Z., Lu, X., Leon-Salas, W., & Tan, J. (2025). Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids. [Data set]. C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. Purdue University. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753
Liu, Zhong, Xiaonan Lu, Walter Leon-Salas, and Jin Tan. Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids. Purdue University, January, 1, 2025. Distributed by C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753
@misc{CMIX_Dataset_99,
title = {Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids},
author = {Liu, Zhong and Lu, Xiaonan and Leon-Salas, Walter and Tan, Jin},
abstractNote = {In this paper, we propose to quantify the trade-off between voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in autonomous AC microgrids with distributed secondary control. It is known that voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in droop-controlled autonomous AC microgrids are two conflicting control objectives that present a natural trade-off between voltage regulation towards the voltage magnitude reference and reactive power sharing accuracy. This trade-off is commonly shown qualitatively without sufficient quantification. In this work, to quantify the trade-off between the two objectives, we focus on distributed secondary control and utilize regression and polynomial surface fitting to identify the requisite parameter area to satisfy the predefined error bands for voltage magnitude regulation and reactive power sharing. Extensive case studies are presented to validate the proposed method.},
url = {https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/99},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange, Purdue University, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753},
note = {Accessed: 2026-06-19},
doi = {10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753}
}
https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753
Details
Data from Jan 1, 2025
Last updated Mar 30, 2026
Submitted Jun 2, 2026
Organization
Purdue University
Contact
Jin, Tan

