Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids

Publicly accessible License 

In this paper, we propose to quantify the trade-off between voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in autonomous AC microgrids with distributed secondary control. It is known that voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in droop-controlled autonomous AC microgrids are two conflicting control objectives that present a natural trade-off between voltage regulation towards the voltage magnitude reference and reactive power sharing accuracy. This trade-off is commonly shown qualitatively without sufficient quantification. In this work, to quantify the trade-off between the two objectives, we focus on distributed secondary control and utilize regression and polynomial surface fitting to identify the requisite parameter area to satisfy the predefined error bands for voltage magnitude regulation and reactive power sharing. Extensive case studies are presented to validate the proposed method.

Citation Formats

TY - DATA AB - In this paper, we propose to quantify the trade-off between voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in autonomous AC microgrids with distributed secondary control. It is known that voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in droop-controlled autonomous AC microgrids are two conflicting control objectives that present a natural trade-off between voltage regulation towards the voltage magnitude reference and reactive power sharing accuracy. This trade-off is commonly shown qualitatively without sufficient quantification. In this work, to quantify the trade-off between the two objectives, we focus on distributed secondary control and utilize regression and polynomial surface fitting to identify the requisite parameter area to satisfy the predefined error bands for voltage magnitude regulation and reactive power sharing. Extensive case studies are presented to validate the proposed method. AU - Liu, Zhong A2 - Lu, Xiaonan A3 - Leon-Salas, Walter A4 - Tan, Jin DB - C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange DP - Open EI | National Laboratory of the Rockies DO - 10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753 KW - Power electronics and inverters KW - Power electronics KW - Inverters KW - Battery energy storage KW - Solar KW - Photovoltaics KW - PV KW - Diesel generators KW - Other liquid-fuel generators KW - Power plant controls KW - SCADA KW - Policy and regulation KW - Policy KW - Regulation KW - Case studies KW - Performance KW - Local energy resources (LER) LA - English DA - 2025/01/01 PY - 2025 PB - Purdue University T1 - Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids UR - https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753 ER -
Export Citation to RIS
Liu, Zhong, et al. Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids. Purdue University, 1 January, 2025, C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753.
Liu, Z., Lu, X., Leon-Salas, W., & Tan, J. (2025). Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids. [Data set]. C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. Purdue University. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753
Liu, Zhong, Xiaonan Lu, Walter Leon-Salas, and Jin Tan. Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids. Purdue University, January, 1, 2025. Distributed by C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753
@misc{CMIX_Dataset_99, title = {Quantitative Trade-Off in Distributed Secondary Control for Autonomous AC Microgrids}, author = {Liu, Zhong and Lu, Xiaonan and Leon-Salas, Walter and Tan, Jin}, abstractNote = {In this paper, we propose to quantify the trade-off between voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in autonomous AC microgrids with distributed secondary control. It is known that voltage regulation and reactive power sharing in droop-controlled autonomous AC microgrids are two conflicting control objectives that present a natural trade-off between voltage regulation towards the voltage magnitude reference and reactive power sharing accuracy. This trade-off is commonly shown qualitatively without sufficient quantification. In this work, to quantify the trade-off between the two objectives, we focus on distributed secondary control and utilize regression and polynomial surface fitting to identify the requisite parameter area to satisfy the predefined error bands for voltage magnitude regulation and reactive power sharing. Extensive case studies are presented to validate the proposed method.}, url = {https://cmix.openei.org/submissions/99}, year = {2025}, howpublished = {C-MIX - Community Microgrid Information Exchange, Purdue University, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753}, note = {Accessed: 2026-06-19}, doi = {10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753} }
https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECCE55643.2024.10860753

Details

Data from Jan 1, 2025

Last updated Mar 30, 2026

Submitted Jun 2, 2026

Organization

Purdue University

Contact

Jin, Tan

Authors

Zhong Liu

Purdue University

Xiaonan Lu

Purdue University

Walter Leon-Salas

Purdue University

Jin Tan

NLR
Submission Downloads